Verifying the truth about the rumors about me

I am just telling you that I am not a squid. Not a squid. I don't care what people are saying, I am not a squid. Just telling you.
Now to the tropic of the day:
Visit the beautiful country of Argentina with its beautiful forests-it is truly beautiful, in a redundant sort of way!
Now to the topic of the day:
Which is more useful in general: Who, What, Where, When or why?
This is purely my opinion, so you may have different ideas. To awnser this, I will go through it systematically. Who is useful when considering the person in subject. Unfortunately, not everything has a who, so it is not the most useful. Everything except for nothing has a what (I guess the what for nothing is nothing). Thus, it goes onto my list of consideration. It is important to know the what, if not the why. Where is slightly important, as I would hate to be in Hitler's concentration camps, but it isn't the most important. When is very important, as it controls the what, where, who, and the what controls the why. I think why is the least important, its good to know, but its not essential.
We have when and what left. When wins by a landslide.
-MwAhAhAhAhA-

potential idea

Just blogging to say I have a potentially great or potential failure idea in the workshop,excpect news in a week
-mwahahahaha-

Apologies for not posting in a while and other information

Hello to all of you,
I did not post in quite long time, and I do have a reason for that-I forgot my password...This may happen often. Anyways, sorry for the lack of posting, I have a new concept I need help with, I could use two helpers soon, but I am not asking for any just yet-too many of my ideas turn out to be duds...Anyways, to todays topic:
Clams vs. Mussels-how are they different and why?
I have been saving this idea for a rainy day, but behold-it is cloudy! Thus, I will compromise with mother nature. The main differenceis that clams are from saltwater whilst mussels enjoy the fresh water environments. Clams are found burrowed into sediment, while mussels don't burrow into sediment but rather attach themselves to the dirt. You can dig for clams, but one cannot dig for mussels. There actually isnt much difference. I am guessing they came from similar origins, but one evolved in fresh water and the other in salt water. The reason the clam burrows is a difficult concept to analyze, and the only pheasable explanation I found is the clam lives in an environment with more predators, so it has to protect itself.
FAQS:
Which one has pearls?
Oysters are the ones with pearls, get your mollusks straight.
Doesn't one of the migrate?
You are probably thinking of scallops, but one form of clam does migrate.
Also, lets give props to Ming the clam, declared the worlds longest living species, at approximately 405 years old (I doubt its the worlds oldest but maybe)
-Mwahahahahaha-

HAPPY NATIONAL DOUGHNUT DAY!!!

HAPPY NATIONAL DOUGHNUT DAY!!!!! This day commemerates the best food in american culture;the doughnut (or informally called donut). If you happen to go to Krispy Kream, yu may get a deal on some Krispy fresh new doughnuts!

New section to the blog

I am going to add a new section to the blog because I has 5 followers. It is likely to be one of the following pictures and something else. Thus, me has a poll. Which picture is better:

This one extremely funny and describes me a bit.

I was going to add one saying comment or the duck gets it and a gun was pointed to a rubber duck, but thats too violent, and I happen to be a pacifist.

Then theres this picture, which is odd and strange but still amusing. It is also the only one I will post not by Gary Larson.

And finally, behold the miracle of science!

How sad...I want you to poll by th end of tommorow if possible by using comments!

yawning: Whats the point?

Yawwwnnnnn, its late. Hello to the new follower, yahhhh I have more followers. Thus, my ideas are a squid. Here is todays topic:
Why do we yawn?
Since its late, I'm going to do an easy question. I didn't have time to post earlier. Anyways, yawining is the flex of muscles such as the jaw for about six seconds. Beleive it or not, thereare only THEORIES as to why we yawn; if you asked this question your not alone. The most illogical reason is why yawn due to boredom. However, this doesn't explain why people from the olympics yawn before they perform. Another theory is that when we evolved, yawning was a way to start to say change the subject (super illogical, if you ak me). The best bet is that yawning takes in oxygen and takes out carbon dioxide. THis is why we yawn in groups. But why don't we yawn during exercise? I'll leave that for you to find out, as experts don't know.
Please comment.
-Mwahahaha-

Structure meets structure: The pinecone versus the chicken leg.

Not much to say today, my ideas are all inklings, though they could grow into octopuses.
Todays less but still confusing question:
Which has a better structure, a pinecone or the leg of livng chicken? You have to choose one, no "they both have different purposes" jargon.
Hmmmmm, this, this is an interesting question. I can't answer this simply, hmmmmm. Ok, I've got an idea. I'll judge it based on:
design
Stability-note this is different than design-
flexibility
The design is the most difficult question, actually. A chicken foot's primary goal is to hold up the humongous chicken, while the pinecone keeps mr. seed safe (and also does not contain high amount of pectin, I think). If i dropped an a hundred pound weight in a pinecone, though flattened it would maintain the same design. If i dropped the same weight on a living chicken leg, I would expect it to be utterly crushed and demolished, with fractured bones. Thus, pinecone wins.
Stability: Pinecone loses, its not meant to be stable.
Flexibility: These are the two stiffestr thing i can imagine, but you can see me breaking off a bit of a pinecone and having it still make a tree, right. I can 't do anything to a leg of a chicken without fracturing it, so pinecone wins.
A pinecone, by my calculations, seems to have a better structure, and may have a go at human legs, but it would lose due to flexibility... Whats youre opinion?
-Mwahahahaha

Pectin and Arsenic: the good and bad of an apple

Hello to my two dedicated, sniff, followers! I am planning a BIG project for the blog. More followers should help. I urge you to tell your friends about this blog, as I am not going to personally advertise and I promise the more attention this blog gets the more attention I will pay to updating the blog. Also, I appreciate and reccomend giving comments, it will help me improve. Now to today's amazingly well thought out and difficult topic:
Pectin and Arsenic are both found in apples. Throughout the day, I was wondering what the advantages where of both pectin and arsenic. So, what are the advantages of pectin and arsenic for the apple?
Good question, myself. I am no apple pro, but I can shine some light on the topic. First, if you don't know what pectin or arsenic are, I will tell you. Pectin is a heteropolysaccharade (these are polymeric carbohydrates) used as a source of fiber and a sweetener. Arsenic is a deadly poison. First I will start with arsenic, I am fairly sure of my answer. Arsenic is only found in the apple seed, which is normally cut out of an apple and its traces are to small to kill humans, fyi. I'm guessing when the seeds reach the ground, they contain arsenic in order to prevent small creatures from eating them, which leads to a larger production of apple trees. For pectin, I had no clue until I finished this sentence. Pectin is used as a sweetener, so I'm guessing once Mr. apple falls of his tree, they want animals to eat it but leave the seeds so they can expand.
With another difficult topic behind us, I have decided to possibly accept some requests, so if your interested, I won't yell at you for asking :p)-akward smiley face, I'll be using these from now on.
-Mwahahahahaha, but my friends call me Mwahahaha for short-

Which came first: The chicken or the duck and a message about followers

I apologize to my two "followers" for posting at this hour, but Homework calls! Now that I've finished my trig, I can post. But first, to anyone who my happen to like this wacky blog, I would like to dedicate the remainder of this paragraph to that semi-big ol' follower button over there. I like followers, but I understand wacko is not everyones cup of tea. However, if you do happen to like this blog, I would reccomend pressing the follower button over there, the more followers I have the more I will edit my blog and improve it. Now, to today's topic:
Who came first? The chicken or the duck?
Since I racked my brain coming up with a good ideas to save, I'm going to analyze the old question that everyone loves. In my opinion, this question is more difficult than it seems. If I had to go with the breeds today, I'm going with ducks. Not only are ducks awesome and chickens aren't as awesome as ducks, but chickens have been evolved specifically to feed humans. Notice there body mass compared to wings, on the body mass index calculators chickens are obese. Even the wings are made for human consumption! They can hardly fly and aren't too bright, as they also evolved to have no instincts. Now, since humans evolved the chicken to what it is today, and our friend the duck is flying out there free with migratory patterns not evolved by people, the duck seems to me to have remained the same longer and thus came before our friend the chicken. However, just to make this more complicated, derivatives of the chicken may have been around as long as derivatives of the duck, asuming they aren't the same species! Thats the end of todays post, try to get the amount of followers up to five and I may start remodeling the site or adding new kinds of posts, that'll be fun
-Mwahahahaha, unless you are the government-

A second post today

Finding out stuff about you isn't the point (stuff is a dead word!!!!), so I decided to double post.
The main point of this blog is, drumrollllllll:
Cheese
I wish, but I don't know that much about cheese. Thus it is a random topic that flies into my head at random intervals (RANDOM INTERVALS!!!-like that).
Today's topic is:
The effect of purple and beavers on American History
America has a very odd and, overall, economically influenced history, so it is important to realize the most insignifiacnt things could affect it. Let's start with purple:
Without purple, it is very likely America, the country of paranoid, could not have been nearly as succesful. We'll stat with the most important affect of purple: agriculture. I know, I know, who would have guessed agriculture over manufacturing in pretty colors (PRETTY COLORS-once again, at random intervals). Indigo (now you understand where this is leading) was a popular cash crop meant to make purple dye. Without Indigo, the southern economy may not have been sufficient to start the Civil War, a perplexing mater indeed. For one would think a war would not be started, but I predict that the South would have started the Civil War later in order to bring in more people so they'd have a chance. Without the guidance of Abraham Lincoln, we may not have won the war. Thus, the South may have ended up a Confederate Union, making all those people who are descendants from Africa still in Slavery. If you are a descendant from Africa living in Mississippi, be thankful for purple.
Also, beavers affected us not nearly as much, but every little creature counts. Beaver skin was a commodity, so it is possible that without the fur traders we would have lost the Revolutionary War; I sincerely doubt this would happen. However, I do guess that The western portion of the United States would not be so large, leading to the loss of major companies and ports in the area. Thats right, if you or your parents work at Microsoft, goodbye homes. If you or your parents work for Boeing, you'd be flying solo up in Washington. But not just Washington, I chose them because they're up North. But if you live in Portland, Oregon, and yu're parent works for (dun dun dun) parametric, you'll be thinking; what's a para and whats a metric. What about DirectTV in los Angeles? You may work for comcast...in Pennsylvania! Thank ye beaver, you've created many job opportunities.
-Mwahahahahaha-

First post: about you and why you came here

Mwahahahaha! This is my blog, not yours, so don't pretend to find anything of any use...To start things off, I'm sure you'd like to know a little bit about me. Well, I want to know a little bit about you, so iI'm going to find out about you just by using an insane sequence of logical reasoning. First of all, since I'm entirely new to this community of people, your probably either a relative of mine, a friend, or some wacko off sitting in their apartment who doesn't haave anything better to do than scroll through blogs. If so, its ok, you're probably either steaming with anger at my post or you are sadly agreeing. Thus, I can tell your shy or you have a bad temper. Some of you are probably sitting there scratching your heads, so to my list I shall add not the sharpest tool in the shed. Some of you are saying, I'm not anything like he's calling me! So I'll add conceited to my list.
Lets recap; you are either:
Conceited
Not the sharpest tool in the shed
Shy
Having a bad temper (grammar check?)
Thus, some of you probably have a weak constitution and are laughing do to my insanity, so I'll add weak constitution. Some of you are bored, because this gets quite boring after the first hour or so, so I'll add bored. Also, I know you know I know you know I am insane, so i'll add paranoid. On second thought, Ill add in sad, depressed, and whining because you have had a bad day and this is just plain not what the doctor ordered.
Finally, I know that you are either:
Conceited
Not the sharpest tool in the shed
Shy
Having a bad temper
grammar check
sad
depressed
bored
having a weak constitution
more grammar check
paranoid
Now I know so much about you!
-Mwahahahaha-